雅思小作文，在很多烤鸭看来是相对容易备考的。那么，问题来了，雅思小作文的3个误区。你中招了吗？

雅思小作文的3个误区一：加入主观推测

雅思写作小作文追求客观性，切勿加入自己的主观推测，也不需要加上对图表的解释。

例：《剑11》Test 3

考生文章

The changes in emission of carbon dioxide can be connected with the changes in economical development and appearance of some new technologies which reduce emssions.

考官评语：

There are attempts at comparison, but there is some irrelevant material in the final paragraph.（最后一段有不相关信息）

例：《剑11》Test 2

考生文章

But in 2010 the number has decreased to 10%, which is good because it shows that more people have learned other languages well.

考官评语：

There is some repetition of information and some irrelevant commentary. （有不相关的评论）

雅思小作文的3个误区二：缺乏数据的支撑

很多考生在对图表进行描述时，只关注于发展趋势，而疏忽了对重要数据的阐述。

例：《剑12》Test 7

考生文章主体段

The major changes can be seen in the groups, who eat in a fast-food restaurant on a weekly basis (once or several times a week) and in the groups in which people visit the fast-food restaurants once or twice a month or once a few months.

While in 2006 most of the US citizens ate at such facilities at least once a week, in 2013 most of the population did so only once or twice a month. It's clear that fast-food of the population did so only once or twice a month.

It's clear that fast-food restaurants were most popular in 2006 and least popular in 2013. However the number of people who eat in such restaurants only a few times every year didn't change.

考官评语：

The candidate organizes the information well and describes in the various groups, but the lack of data to support the description throughout the response is a significant omission.（整篇文章缺乏数据支撑是一个很严重的疏忽）

雅思小作文的3个误区三：缺乏对比

小作文的题干对其写作有很明确的要求，"Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant". （在相关的地方作比较）所以，考生在对重要特点进行描述的同时，切勿忘记作比较。

例：《剑7》Test 1

考生文章主体段第一段：

Food, drinks and tobacco were in the most important position on consumer spending in all of the five countries, and in a different percentage. In Ireland and Turkey, they were near 30%, while in the other three countries they are under 20%.

考官评语：

There is no clear reference to what the percentage represent and key comparisons need more expansion.（关键的比较需要更多的阐述）